Skip to main content

To Re-Open Or Not To Re-open Schools?--That is the Question!

My take so far on school reopenings based on very preliminary data: 

- The countries with the best school reopening track records have typically had quite restricted formats such as very small, highly distanced class sizes plus low country COVID-19 case levels per capita--many less infections per person than in the USA.  So we need to realize that we can't just copy what they did.

- The biggest risk seems to be to teachers & staff.  Kids are less vulnerable & less infectious.  We need to consider all of them, and parents, too!

- If we can flatten the state curve & have hospital capacity, it seems worth letting schools without local spikes reopen very carefully physically--including with recess! 

- Then track closely & share immediately what is happening & learn from each other.

- Let's get real:  Given the shortcomings of our hastily improvised hybrid teaching models, by this time next year, we could easily have lost on average 1/2 year or more of learning, particularly among lower-income students.  Yet we will have less tax revenue to pay for recovery-learning, due to the economic downturn & family budgets.

- So a big part of the risk to kids that we need to consider is their overall K-12 educational & health attainment, which will determine much of their lifelong socioeconomic well-being.  We can't just focus on what they are risking right now.

- The coronavirus pandemic is much more deadly due to the 40+ year pre-existing epidemic of chronic disease:  heart disease, obesity, diabetes, etc.  Younger adults with severe obesity, which typically started as child inactivity & obesity, seem to be at particularly high risk for their age from COVID-19. 

- The chronic disease epidemic is being caused more than anything else by inactivity & unhealthy nutrition.  Yet the viral pandemic is reducing activity & healthy nutrition further for children, by decreasing recess, PE, health ed, school meals, etc.--not to mention the stress & social-emotional impact.  The pandemic is accelerating a pre-existing downward spiral.

- It's time to start considering both short- and long-term how we should proceed in the coming months!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is it a “Miracle Drug”?...if it Costs a Fortune and Creates Lifelong Dependency...&...Saggy Faces!?

[It’s been a while since our last blog post.  A lot has happened since– including some “miracles” ! So we’re going to do two posts in a row…] Normally we should all be happy about miracle drugs... shouldn't we ? Yes, there is lots of upside from taking semaglutide (Ozempic, Wegovy), tirzepatide (Montjaro)--and upcoming new, even-more-miraculous drugs TBD:  losing huge amounts of weight quickly, a much lower risk of diabetes–and probably less heart disease and other chronic conditions as well.  But what if the “miracle” requires:   $200-300/week, with a lifetime cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars…  a drug that you can never quit…because if you stop taking it, you gain back all the weight it helped you lose–not to mention the chronic diseases which the drugs kept at bay… and it leaves your face (and the rest of your skin?) sagging …    (plus, it’s so new at such high dosages– who knows what happens after years of use…? ) No doubt, in spit...

Urban food myth #1: it costs more to eat healthy than to eat fast food

I get so tired of hearing this: "It costs less to buy a burger from McDonald's that to eat healthy food from the supermarket." "Low-income families just buy processed food, they don't cook their own food anymore." That always sounded questionable.  Here is a study showing in great detail that fast food is much more expensive than healthy food bought at the supermarket . Also, it turns out that the vast majority of meals eaten by low-income families are prepared at home: Blisard N, Stewart H. How low-income households allocate their food budget relative to the cost of the Thrifty Food Plan. Economic research report, United States. Washington, DC: Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2006;20. What is true is that buying healthy vs. unhealthy foods can cost $1.50/person/day more, at retail prices.  However, when health cost consequences are factored in, unhealthy foods cost twice as much .

Health "benefits"?: Oh well...

We meet them all the time:  people trapped in their job, in order to keep their health benefits.   We need a study on the negative impact on entrepreneurship and the economy from people health-handcuffed to their current jobs.  From my limited anecdoctal evidence, the costs are astronomical.   Two-income families have made the labor market much more geographically immobile, and now health insurance is exacerbating the job-jail. Modern Healthcare just summarized results of a new Peterson-Kaiser study  on employer health insurance and the actual cost to employee families, of the combination of employee share of premiums plus employee out-of-pocket health costs. Employers keep shifting more and more health costs to employees. The only good news is that employers are still paying a (fast-shrinking) % of premiums--so health costs are still cheaper than being self-employed.  [Also, if we end up back in the uncovered pre-existing conditions bad-...