Skip to main content

“The vulnerability of African-Americans to the coronavirus is a national emergency.” The Economist, May 30, 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic, aided and abetted by racial disparities from the 50+ year chronic disease epidemic, has harmed blacks much more than whites.  Who is really surprised, crocodile tears aside, that blacks are dying at much higher rates than whites from the virus?   

As The Economist implies, African-American health has been worse than white health for centuries--but do whites really even care?  Major investments have been made in government programs, but the dismal outcomes remain.  

When it comes to public health, it’s not about what you say you care about, or what you try to do--it’s about the results. 

Exhibit A that it can be done: we reduced smoking by ⅔ in the course of more than five decades of hard policy and program work.  Smoking among black men declined even more than among white men--and by 2008 black teens smoked at half the rate of whites.

What will we do about our inactivity & unhealthy nutrition epidemic--which is much bigger, costlier & deadlier than the COVID-19 pandemic?  It damages African-, Native-, and Latino-American health disproportionately, every year--as well as harming whites on a massive scale.  

Let’s please not bother with happy-talk (yes, including The Economist magazine itself), unless we are committed to moving the needle dramatically. When it comes to health, words do not speak--sustained actions do.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is it a “Miracle Drug”?...if it Costs a Fortune and Creates Lifelong Dependency...&...Saggy Faces!?

[It’s been a while since our last blog post.  A lot has happened since– including some “miracles” ! So we’re going to do two posts in a row…] Normally we should all be happy about miracle drugs... shouldn't we ? Yes, there is lots of upside from taking semaglutide (Ozempic, Wegovy), tirzepatide (Montjaro)--and upcoming new, even-more-miraculous drugs TBD:  losing huge amounts of weight quickly, a much lower risk of diabetes–and probably less heart disease and other chronic conditions as well.  But what if the “miracle” requires:   $200-300/week, with a lifetime cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars…  a drug that you can never quit…because if you stop taking it, you gain back all the weight it helped you lose–not to mention the chronic diseases which the drugs kept at bay… and it leaves your face (and the rest of your skin?) sagging …    (plus, it’s so new at such high dosages– who knows what happens after years of use…? ) No doubt, in spit...

Urban food myth #1: it costs more to eat healthy than to eat fast food

I get so tired of hearing this: "It costs less to buy a burger from McDonald's that to eat healthy food from the supermarket." "Low-income families just buy processed food, they don't cook their own food anymore." That always sounded questionable.  Here is a study showing in great detail that fast food is much more expensive than healthy food bought at the supermarket . Also, it turns out that the vast majority of meals eaten by low-income families are prepared at home: Blisard N, Stewart H. How low-income households allocate their food budget relative to the cost of the Thrifty Food Plan. Economic research report, United States. Washington, DC: Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2006;20. What is true is that buying healthy vs. unhealthy foods can cost $1.50/person/day more, at retail prices.  However, when health cost consequences are factored in, unhealthy foods cost twice as much .

Health "benefits"?: Oh well...

We meet them all the time:  people trapped in their job, in order to keep their health benefits.   We need a study on the negative impact on entrepreneurship and the economy from people health-handcuffed to their current jobs.  From my limited anecdoctal evidence, the costs are astronomical.   Two-income families have made the labor market much more geographically immobile, and now health insurance is exacerbating the job-jail. Modern Healthcare just summarized results of a new Peterson-Kaiser study  on employer health insurance and the actual cost to employee families, of the combination of employee share of premiums plus employee out-of-pocket health costs. Employers keep shifting more and more health costs to employees. The only good news is that employers are still paying a (fast-shrinking) % of premiums--so health costs are still cheaper than being self-employed.  [Also, if we end up back in the uncovered pre-existing conditions bad-...