Skip to main content

Don't repeal & replace PE!: Letter to the Editor, The Atlantic

Just submitted the following letter to the editor to The Atlantic, in response to

Making grants without requiring high-quality evidence-based strategies, as Texas Fitness Now did, often does not end well--especially when combined with “bad PE” at a number of schools.  But contradicting the stereotypes, Desy, Peterson & Brockman showed that “gym” is actually the favorite subject of many middle-schoolers.  So beware the unintended collateral damage:  continuing to slash PE (& recess) risks further demotivating large numbers of students, many of whom are already at-risk.  “No PE” may be even more of a threat to student engagement & success than “bad PE.” 

And we should not look at this issue in isolation.  How can we keep cutting physical education, as we enter our 5th decade of a deadly serious chronic disease epidemic now affecting the majority of Americans—especially when so much disease is caused by inactivity & unhealthy nutrition, starting in childhood? 

Instead, we need “good PE” as part of the solution.  K-12 school settings with enough quality physical & health education, recess, nutrition, & other evidence-based whole-child practices, play an irreplaceable role in developing healthy habits for the next generation.  We do not have a second chance for a 13-year-long opportunity to reach everyone, at an ideal stage of life for change.  
  
With the right combination of evidence-based, scalable, effective, affordable & self-funding strategies—including “good PE” —we have a promising path forward to better lives for all. 

Scott Turner, MBA, MA, PhD
President & CEO, Healthy Future US
Scott.Turner@HealthyFutureUS.org

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is it a “Miracle Drug”?...if it Costs a Fortune and Creates Lifelong Dependency...&...Saggy Faces!?

[It’s been a while since our last blog post.  A lot has happened since– including some “miracles” ! So we’re going to do two posts in a row…] Normally we should all be happy about miracle drugs... shouldn't we ? Yes, there is lots of upside from taking semaglutide (Ozempic, Wegovy), tirzepatide (Montjaro)--and upcoming new, even-more-miraculous drugs TBD:  losing huge amounts of weight quickly, a much lower risk of diabetes–and probably less heart disease and other chronic conditions as well.  But what if the “miracle” requires:   $200-300/week, with a lifetime cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars…  a drug that you can never quit…because if you stop taking it, you gain back all the weight it helped you lose–not to mention the chronic diseases which the drugs kept at bay… and it leaves your face (and the rest of your skin?) sagging …    (plus, it’s so new at such high dosages– who knows what happens after years of use…? ) No doubt, in spit...

Both/And: Personal & School & Social Responsibility for Health

Many people are promoting a false dichotomy for who/what to “blame” for decades of pervasive inactivity & unhealthy nutrition--the key preventable factors which have led to the majority of adults developing chronic disease. Some believe that people with preventable chronic diseases made a series of unhealthy choices for decades, for which they need to accept personal responsibility for the consequences. On the other side, a growing number of policymakers focus on the “social determinants of health.”  In other words, there are many things beyond your control, which impact what you eat & drink and how active you are.  This includes factors such as your family, neighborhood, school, employer, transportation, public safety, housing, community layout, etc. etc.  It’s those external social factors which determine your health destiny.   Actually, the personal and social are inextricably connected--not opposite ends of the spectrum.  Let’s consider the role...

Post Modern Healthcare’s Leadership Symposium: From Frustrations with Adult Health to Childhood Solutions

During the main panel discussion at highly influential Modern Healthcare magazine’s Leadership Symposium recently, prominent industry CEOs shared their frustrations on the need for change in health care but the lack of progress.  Of all the comments made in a poll of attendees, Modern Healthcare highlighted one by Erin Hammond, a senior value-based programs professional at Humana [ emphasis added by me]:  “Medicare Advantage and Medicare should start for high-risk communities the first day of preschool .  That way the government and healthcare orgs have an entire lifetime to shape healthy habits that will impact the high cost of the elderly population.  Between that and a sugar tax and increasing the quality of food we make available to our population...we would not only see the quality and healthy days of our citizens enhance as they get older, but much lower medical costs .”   Even if you don’t believe in a single cradle-to-grave health plan for all or tax...